tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post430850569517657199..comments2023-09-01T20:40:52.161-07:00Comments on Debunking the 9/11 No-Planes Theory: The "Nose-Out" FallacySaul Tranehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15535710574469682823noreply@blogger.comBlogger29125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-82457998262801181282021-09-13T14:50:33.212-07:002021-09-13T14:50:33.212-07:00This doesn't "debunk" anything! It i...This doesn't "debunk" anything! It is obvious that at least one of the "planes" was fake, CGI because you can see how the wing temporarily goes BEHIND a building that is farther off in the distance. Planes do not fly at that speed that close to the ground & if a real plane was flown into a steel framed skyscraper its nose cone would smash FLAT & the whole aircraft would fall straight DOWN. It would not become a bugs bunny cartoon & pass through to the other side. Use some common sense!Christine Leinonin's Drewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08494808441594418950noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-8585360074291969802021-06-30T16:16:42.069-07:002021-06-30T16:16:42.069-07:00The planes of 9/11 were crude computer graphics se...The planes of 9/11 were crude computer graphics seen only on TV. There were no still photos. The planes were computer graphic images https://rumble.com/vik5ep-crystal-clear-side-by-side.html <br />Truth Partyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07763061030085284855noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-675504672967356022020-09-23T13:08:57.938-07:002020-09-23T13:08:57.938-07:00They didn't. You just think they did because y...They didn't. You just think they did because your doped up ex-rock hero Ace Baker told you there wasn't a river or sky or anything like that.Anonymous Personhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16403649201973363502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-50133944123140355902020-09-23T13:07:18.708-07:002020-09-23T13:07:18.708-07:00Which "US pilot" is that, and are you su...Which "US pilot" is that, and are you sure that's what he or she said?Anonymous Personhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16403649201973363502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-17246205354038149242020-09-23T13:05:24.004-07:002020-09-23T13:05:24.004-07:00There WAS NO "mock footage."There WAS NO "mock footage."Anonymous Personhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16403649201973363502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-65704122620479365522020-06-01T18:15:12.796-07:002020-06-01T18:15:12.796-07:00I agree, entirely. Here's why - neither commen...I agree, entirely. Here's why - neither commentator, on the 2 videos that show a plane flying into a building (hey didn't the site's author say there were FOUR additional shots, besides Baker's 3? I saw the 2 w the planes that could have been added later, I saw CBS but there's no moment-of-impact... then where's the other 2 live shots that allegedly exist? Were they so boring as to not be worthy of posting a repeating GIF of each?) Anyway, on the 2 shots in question, where we seem to see a plane impact a building, neither commentator even MENTIONS seeing a plane approaching. They both only react to the explosion. So, I say, the commentary is live / real, the picture has been tampered with. There was no plane to be seen, live, by those commentators, thus no mention of a plane by said commentators. Thank you for helping to BOLSTER Ace's theory.BeHeaderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17577194877199229005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-54246784433441414742020-06-01T18:12:50.818-07:002020-06-01T18:12:50.818-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.BeHeaderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17577194877199229005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-90655238728305549312020-05-21T03:20:43.257-07:002020-05-21T03:20:43.257-07:00A US pilot said publicly that no pilot in the US c...A US pilot said publicly that no pilot in the US can fly that plane into the Pentagon like that. An Arab with 2 hours training on a flight simulator cannot do it either.Junksculptorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10354448715823453924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-10909484128713157222020-02-18T13:33:42.911-08:002020-02-18T13:33:42.911-08:00the building was all over the streets. dust 3 inch...the building was all over the streets. dust 3 inches thick. there was a big pile but a lot of it was melted into the basement. the rubble was burning for 2 weeks+ after the event. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08061489820837253920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-38612231686337291692019-08-09T14:59:58.053-07:002019-08-09T14:59:58.053-07:00Because the mock footage wasn't of a stock 757...Because the mock footage wasn't of a stock 757... Take your damage control down the road and kick rocks deep stateAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05642263436111362171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-19310102567916288122019-06-17T11:33:30.493-07:002019-06-17T11:33:30.493-07:00YES!ABSOLUTELY!!... 100 floors of Steel & Conc...YES!ABSOLUTELY!!... 100 floors of Steel & Concrete <br />DUSTIFIED in just ONE HOUR !?!....Seriously?...and <br />HOW can Aluminum Passenger Planes Fly at 500 MPH @ <br />200 Ft, w/o the WINGS COMING OFF?...not to mention<br />the STEEL BEAMS are BLOWN OUT & not IN !!!<br />OFFJindan 17https://www.blogger.com/profile/14891901892066515184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-72071984075119891842018-03-17T17:46:40.104-07:002018-03-17T17:46:40.104-07:00Total CGI fabrication.Live camera footage showed r...Total CGI fabrication.Live camera footage showed river, background scenery, New Jersey, Sky, clouds,The CGI version was with no sky, no background scenery, no New Jersey.It was a rush to get the CGI version ready for the news propaganda to show planes doing the impossible.Poorly fabricated!<br />And for your information aluminum Airplanes can't penetrate CONCRETE& STEEL.Impossible, couldn't happen,<br />defies all logic known to man.DR BAGZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12331531613990602861noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-88172534595031347012018-03-17T17:35:04.329-07:002018-03-17T17:35:04.329-07:00All of the video's released on 9-12 had no bac...All of the video's released on 9-12 had no background scenery.Such as the blue sky, river, buildings across the river.The "new video's of planes" were all a grey background with zero scenery <br />that was in the live video on 9-11.Try and explane how everything changed,sky, no river, zero background that was all visible in live camera shots.Sorry thus doesn't add up.TOTAL CGI.GET REAL.DR BAGZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12331531613990602861noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-50113113916028262332017-10-22T20:34:24.238-07:002017-10-22T20:34:24.238-07:00First, why was the chopper already focused on the ...First, why was the chopper already focused on the floors the plane was going to impact. Second, how did the cameraman know the exact moment of impact to zoom in at the exact same time? Not to overzoom, or underzoom. Not to lose the framing and have to frantically move the camera to get the picture back into frame as happens in just about all other spontaneously shot footage that took cameramen completely by surprise? This is filmed as if someone told the cameraman, "be here at this spot focused on this floor at precisely this time." In fact, every video is shot in this manner. Is there one you can show where someone is actually surprised? One of the video's shows the person focused on a clock. right as the minute changes, he immediately pans up to catch the fireball. What, the loud screeching plane isn't enough to take this guy's focus off that lovely digital clock? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04029696178077640839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-53397830777779911242017-07-15T10:17:04.103-07:002017-07-15T10:17:04.103-07:00This site is a deliberate misinformation campaign ...This site is a deliberate misinformation campaign trying to rewrite the narrative with all new 'live' footage (conveniently located at official sources on youtube) that differs from the original footage aired, where a 'plane' cannot be made out. There is a different, much smaller object on the same collision course as later high quality cgi video samples but it is certainly not a plane. These 'live' broadcasts have been tampered with.<br /><br />This individual certainly knows this having 'researched' this topic so deeply and thus is likely in the employ of some very powerful people.Ldubzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17581045988301512724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-22269283097720211022017-07-15T10:10:27.148-07:002017-07-15T10:10:27.148-07:00Tyler, tangling one conspiracy in with another doe...Tyler, tangling one conspiracy in with another does the first no justice. It's part of the handbook for 'Black Propaganda'. The towers were mostly hollow so the people could walk around, do business and such. <br /><br />You didn't really expect there to be a pile of rubble the same size as the complete towers? You can't be that slow.<br /><br />No planes is not 'aside'. There were none.Ldubzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17581045988301512724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-56106851721406876632017-07-15T10:06:55.130-07:002017-07-15T10:06:55.130-07:00Don't bother arguing here Frank. This is a den...Don't bother arguing here Frank. This is a den of sycophants gobbling up their beloved blue-pill goo from a licensed curator of lies.Ldubzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17581045988301512724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-82342169841395809722017-07-04T08:12:00.055-07:002017-07-04T08:12:00.055-07:00This site has some WRONG conclusions. Ace Baker di...This site has some WRONG conclusions. Ace Baker did better job..RECENT INFO MODERATORS https://www.blogger.com/profile/09013678002845852774noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-25255528906588910432017-01-16T18:38:40.225-08:002017-01-16T18:38:40.225-08:00Wait, are you actually implying that the towers th...Wait, are you actually implying that the towers themselves were holograms? That's even funnier than the no plane theory...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16515992539530582818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-13862587346477512032016-10-04T15:39:03.551-07:002016-10-04T15:39:03.551-07:00No planes aside, where did the towers go after the...No planes aside, where did the towers go after they collapsed?? There simply is not enough rubbel at ground zero. Sorry for blowing your brain apart...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08989481558392517937noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-8989920266862427772016-09-21T14:44:48.951-07:002016-09-21T14:44:48.951-07:00There's no superimposed image. The debris clou...There's no superimposed image. The debris cloud exiting the tower resembles the shape of the nose cone from certain angles, but from other angles it's obvious what it is. It's as simple as that. Saul Tranehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15535710574469682823noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-54186943158660248162016-09-20T08:04:46.427-07:002016-09-20T08:04:46.427-07:00 To follow up my point the video you are looking a... To follow up my point the video you are looking at is simply what happened when the explosives went off. The other videos have the suupeimposed image of the nose of the plane. It seems like we are at the first grade level with a discussion like this but so be itAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-81113258951573764822016-09-20T07:34:33.066-07:002016-09-20T07:34:33.066-07:00quote "f the CGI "no-plane theory" ... quote "f the CGI "no-plane theory" is correct and it's the nose of a computer generated plane animation that can be seen exiting the opposite side of the tower in the FOX Chopper footage, then why doesn't the nose hold it's shape"? <br /><br />first is of course you make no rebuttal regarding whether the image that is suggested by baker appears, as well as we can make scientific claims of similarity of shape and lightness of the object<br /><br /> Second the suggestion is that there is a coordination between the video compositing of the plane and the expected behavior of the planted explosives in the building.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-89346418253847416752016-07-02T17:55:42.907-07:002016-07-02T17:55:42.907-07:00I agree as well. Ace did a great job with just a c...I agree as well. Ace did a great job with just a common approach of hey, i know how that was done. Ive seen shitty work before with composites. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01166860861485493033noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5818122371845220982.post-13361757821678670822016-04-24T17:20:21.116-07:002016-04-24T17:20:21.116-07:00Compare the quality of Mr. Baker's video resea...Compare the quality of Mr. Baker's video research (along with AB's demonstrated expertise in video graphics and compositing) in conjunction with his elequent logic, against the poor-quality childish rebuttals presented here; it's a no-brainer, Ace wins in a landslide. Zebhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08813483938256564865noreply@blogger.com