Jun 18, 2016

Aircraft Parts and Debris Found Near the Twin Towers on 9/11/2001

Piece of fuselage from AA11
Fuselage from AA11




Airplane seat cushion. 

Wheel from Flight AA11 embedded in column panel on the street south of WTC1.











https://www.filesanywhere.com/FS/M.aspx?v=8c6f62885aa0acabafa3
Piece of landing gear from UA 175. 









 






21 comments:

  1. They claim have found the passports and license of the hijackers from the debris, but not the blackboxes of the plains, How convenient is that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes, and I see plenty of 'aircraft parts' here with zero fire damage yet according to the official story the planes either 'slammed into' or 'tore through' the towers, both of which were accompanied by massive fireballs. so... which one is it... aircraft parts without fire damage? or planes hitting buildings and causing massive fireballs? can't have both...

      Delete
    2. Plenty of plane crashes that the black boxes are destroyed. For whatever reason people believe they are indestructible 🤦‍♂️

      Delete
  2. And plenty of other personal property from the planes, but you people either ignore or overlook that for your conspiracy fairy tale. You want "convenience?" The phone calls from the planes and footage of the planes crashing into the towers serve as reasonable substitutes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Phone calls are not possible when flying. Video footage has got glitches as digitally added imagery, by a TV station. Show me real pictures from people's cameras

      Delete
    2. It'd called an air phone, go Google it. And of course you keep expecting 4k quality video when this happened in 2001 when camera quality was poor.

      Delete
  3. Sorry, cell phone didn't work in airplanes back in 2001 ,,, even Ted Olson has copped out!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's BS! It was absolutely possible to talk in a cellphone on board a plane in 2001! Ffs.. Are people thinking thus occurred 49 years ago or what?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. only if the plane had a broadcast mast and your cellphone connected to it, which would be silly because you could just use the seat-phone. how do cell towers work? you make a call. cellphone sends a signal to the nearest cell tower. the signal is sent to the next cell tower. and so on and so on. the process of changing cell towers is not instant. i.e. if you are moving fast enough, the call will not connect (if you haven't connected) or will disconnect (if you are already connected). THIS IS STILL TRUE TODAY in 2022. So get with the programme.

      Delete
    2. What? there were only two cell phone calls placed on 9/11. Both were from UAL93. Both were when the aircraft was below 7,000ft. Both did not last longer than a minute or so. Both took several attempts before the calls were connected due to poor reception. Then again that's why majority of calls were made via air phone 🤦‍♂️

      Delete
  5. And what does all these aircraft parts have in common? They're all small enough to be transported via freight elevator to be 'pre-positioned' for the ensuing blast.
    But thanks for playing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you think they were all small enough to be transported by freight elevator, you're not paying attention.

      Delete
  6. Hahaha... All the planted parts and photos of them in the world, still does nothing to refute the science that says what is supposed to have happened on 911 is not possible. There is a reason that the "no planes theory" is so persuasive. The belief in science says that it is what happened despite what anyone says they have seen. People go to magic shows and some of them come away swearing that the magician actually did magic. While others know that it is not possible to pull a rabbit out of thin air, so, no matter how convincing the trick/illusion is, they know that it is false.

    9/11 was just an illusion, in the real world, according to science it isn't possible. In addition to the science, there are tell tale clues that should not exist if the story were actually real. If the story were real, the jet engine found on Murry Street would actually be an engine from a 767, instead it is identified as the engine from a 747. So, what is it doing in the place where the film shows it exiting the south tower and heading that way? Why are people saying they saw this engine hit the ground and bounce around? No 747 lost an engine in the area that day, so what is this engine doing there? The engine is 9 feet in diameter this spindle is more than 4 feet in diameter. The towers were encircled with box columns that were 16 inches square on 40 inch centers. Okay, let's do a little math.

    2 16 inch box columns, with their centers 40 inches apart would leave 24 inches between them. (8 inches for the center of each column, so you subtract 16 inches (2 columns) from 40 leaves you with 24 inches between columns, so how does a 4 foot wide engine exit the north face of the south tower without breaking a single column? Hahaha... So you begin to see the errors they made in creating this illusion.

    There's a whole lot more as well, have a look here:
    https://themindlesspraetorianblog.blogspot.com/p/911-evidence-of-treason-parts-i-viii.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "9/11 was just an illusion, in the real world, according to science it isn't possible."
      No, Obwon, you people just think you can blurt out "science" and make your propaganda seem more credible. In fact what's truly impossible is how you expect the government to have planted all this debris.

      Delete
    2. Even when many of the aircraft parts found were not from one of the airliners alleged hijacked? The official fantasy story is so very screwed up non-sense from day one.

      Delete
    3. What? Point out which parts didn't belong to the 767-757 used on 9/11.

      Delete
    4. What are you talking about? The RB211 is used in 747 and 767s
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_RB211

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. Any day now you can debunk how those aren't aircraft parts

      Delete